ArticleMicromachines2025
Investigation of the Thermal Conductance of MEMS Contact Switches.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of Processing Parameters and Application Performance Evaluation of a High Thermal Conductivity, Low Thermal Resistance Gel.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CMOS-Compatible Micro Photovoltaic Generator with Post-Processing Enhanced Optical Absorption.Micromachines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microelectromechanical system (MEMS) devices are specialized electronic devices that integrate the benefits of both mechanical and electrical structures. However, the contact behavior between the interfaces of these structures can significantly impact the performance of MEMS devices, particularly when the surface roughness approaches the characteristic size of the devices. In such cases, the contact between the interfaces is not a perfect face-to-face interaction but occurs through point-to-point contact. As a result, the contact area changes with varying contact pressures and surface roughness, influencing the thermal and electrical performance. By integrating the CMY model with finite element simulations, we systematically explored the thermal conductance regulation mechanism of MEMS contact switches. We analyzed the effects of the contact pressure, micro-hardness, surface roughness, and other parameters on thermal conductance, providing essential theoretical support for enhancing reliability and optimizing thermal management in MEMS contact switches. We examined the thermal contact, gap, and joint conductance of an MEMS switch under different contact pressures, micro-hardness values, and surface roughness levels using the CMY model. Our findings show that both the thermal contact and gap conductance increase with higher contact pressure. For a fixed contact pressure, the thermal contact conductance decreases with rising micro-hardness and root mean square (RMS) surface roughness but increases with a higher mean asperity slope. Notably, the thermal gap conductance is considerably lower than the thermal contact conductance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.