Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872379›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2025

Investigation of the Thermal Conductance of MEMS Contact Switches.

Zhiqiang Chen, Zhongbin Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhiqiang ChenSchool of Mechano-Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5417-2818
Zhongbin XieSchool of Mechano-Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62104181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microelectromechanical system (MEMS) devices are specialized electronic devices that integrate the benefits of both mechanical and electrical structures. However, the contact behavior between the interfaces of these structures can significantly impact the performance of MEMS devices, particularly when the surface roughness approaches the characteristic size of the devices. In such cases, the contact between the interfaces is not a perfect face-to-face interaction but occurs through point-to-point contact. As a result, the contact area changes with varying contact pressures and surface roughness, influencing the thermal and electrical performance. By integrating the CMY model with finite element simulations, we systematically explored the thermal conductance regulation mechanism of MEMS contact switches. We analyzed the effects of the contact pressure, micro-hardness, surface roughness, and other parameters on thermal conductance, providing essential theoretical support for enhancing reliability and optimizing thermal management in MEMS contact switches. We examined the thermal contact, gap, and joint conductance of an MEMS switch under different contact pressures, micro-hardness values, and surface roughness levels using the CMY model. Our findings show that both the thermal contact and gap conductance increase with higher contact pressure. For a fixed contact pressure, the thermal contact conductance decreases with rising micro-hardness and root mean square (RMS) surface roughness but increases with a higher mean asperity slope. Notably, the thermal gap conductance is considerably lower than the thermal contact conductance.

Indexed as

interface interactionmicroelectromechanical systems (MEMS)surface roughnessthermal conductance

Identifiers

PMID40872379
PMCPMC12388443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.