ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Pandemic Disruptions to Private Pathology Testing Uptake in Australia, 2019-2024.
Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new human pathogen triggering a pandemic can impact health directly through disease resulting from infection and indirectly through health system disruption. The COVID-19 pandemic is hypothesised to have impacted pathology testing by impacting healthcare and pathology operations and reducing healthcare attendance for fear of infection. The impacts of COVID-19 incidence and pandemic control measures on non-COVID pathology testing were assessed in four Australian states/territories using pathology data (histology, prostate-specific antigen, gynaecological cytology, complete blood count, haemoglobin A1c, and human immunodeficiency virus) from a large national private pathology provider (January 2019-December 2024). Weekly testing volumes from lockdown periods were compared to the equivalent weeks in 2019. All pathology tests demonstrated a substantial decline during the initial national lockdown in March 2020. Subsequent lockdowns were also associated with disruption. For example, complete blood count testing in Victoria was -22% in March 2020 and -5% in the second wave that year. Total annual testing volumes were lower for all tests in 2020 compared to 2019, excluding haemoglobin A1c, and reduced testing persisted through to 2024. The findings indicate substantial and sustained negative pandemic impacts on pathology testing. Reductions in pathology testing signal heightened risk of delayed disease diagnosis, disrupted chronic disease management, and poorer health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.