ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Can Oral Fluids Replace Nasal Swabs in Swine Influenza A Virus (swIAV) PCR Diagnostics?
Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detecting swine influenza A virus during fattening and at slaughter: implications for monitoring strategies in fattening herds.Porcine health management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnosis of swine influenza A virus (swIAV) has to involve laboratory detection, as the clinical signs are not pathognomonic. Nasal swabs (NSs) have been the preferred sample material for swIAV PCR diagnostics, but oral fluid (OF) is a convenient alternative material. In this study, NSs and OFs from 35 Polish swine herds were collected and tested with real-time RT-PCR in order to assess swIAV circulation patterns in Poland and improve protocols for efficient, non-invasive and cost-effective swIAV surveillance in pig farms. The study showed that the swIAV RNA was detected in 65.7% of the tested farms. In total, 21.2% of NS pools and 48.6% of OF samples were positive for swIAV. The Ct values in NS pools and OFs were similar (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.