Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872285›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Using Biocontrol Fungi to Control Helminthosis in Wild Animals: An Innovative Proposal for the Health and Conservation of Species.

Júlia Dos Santos Fonseca, Beatriz Bacelar Barbosa, Adolfo Paz Silva, María Sol Arias Vázquez, Cristiana Filipa Cazapal Monteiro, Huarrisson Azevedo Santos, Jackson Victor de Araújo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Júlia Dos Santos FonsecaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro-UFRRJ, Seropédica 23890-000, RJ, Brazil.
Beatriz Bacelar BarbosaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro-UFRRJ, Seropédica 23890-000, RJ, Brazil.
Adolfo Paz SilvaDepartment of Animal Pathology, University of Santiago de Compostela-USC, Lugo, 27002 Galícia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0208-3861
María Sol Arias VázquezDepartment of Animal Pathology, University of Santiago de Compostela-USC, Lugo, 27002 Galícia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2682-9015
Cristiana Filipa Cazapal MonteiroDepartment of Animal Pathology, University of Santiago de Compostela-USC, Lugo, 27002 Galícia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0368-6645
Huarrisson Azevedo SantosDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro-UFRRJ, Seropédica 23890-000, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8218-3626
Jackson Victor de AraújoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7367-4071

Funding

CAPES 001CNPq 001FAPEMIG 001FAPERJ 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helminth parasites of wild animals represent a major threat to the health of these animals, leading to significant losses in performance, health, and zoonotic implications. In some zoos, anthelmintics have traditionally been used to control these parasites, many of which are also zoonotic. Other actions, such as the removal of organic waste, have also been adopted. Few or no control measures are applied to free-ranging wild animals. Helminthophagous fungi are a promising biological alternative. When animals ingest fungal spores, they are excreted in their feces, where they trap and destroy helminth larvae and eggs, preventing and reducing the parasite load in the environment. Another alternative is to administer fungi by spraying them directly into the environment. This review aims to examine the use of helminthophagous fungi in the control of helminthiases in wild animals, highlighting their potential to minimize dependence on chemical treatments and promote sustainable animal breeding and production. There are many challenges to making this viable, such as environmental variability, stability of formulations, and acceptance of this new technology. These fungi have been shown to reduce parasite burdens in wild animals by up to 75% and can be administered through the animals' feeding troughs. To date, evidence shows that helminthophagous fungi can reliably curb environmental parasite loads for extended periods, offering a sustainable alternative to repeated anthelmintic dosing. Their use has been linked to tangible gains in body condition, weight, and overall welfare in various captive and free-ranging wildlife species.

Indexed as

Animals, WildFungiHelminthiasisAnimalsHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansDuddingtonia flagransnematophagous fungiparasite controlwildlifezoonoses

Identifiers

PMID40872285
PMCPMC12389593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.