Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872277›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluation of Spleen Swabs for Sensitive and High-Throughput Detection of Classical Swine Fever Virus.

Orie Hochman, Kalhari Goonewardene, Chungwon J Chung, Aruna Ambagala

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Orie HochmanNational Centre for Foreign Animal Disease, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3M4, Canada.
Kalhari GoonewardeneNational Centre for Foreign Animal Disease, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3M4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1949-7961
Chungwon J ChungForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, United States Department of Agriculture, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Greenport, NY 11944, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4525-5539
Aruna AmbagalaNational Centre for Foreign Animal Disease, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3M4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1783-2105

Funding

CFIA, USDA and US National Pork Board CFIA and USDA intramural funding, CFIA Technology Development (TD) Project Funding (N-000314) and the US National Pork Board funding (NPB Project #22-091)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite intensive eradication efforts, classical swine fever (CSF) remains endemic across South America, Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean, highlighting the need for more effective surveillance and detection methods. Reverse-transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR) is the fastest, and most sensitive assay for detecting CSF virus (CSFV) genomic material. Previously, we demonstrated that spleen swabs outperformed spleen homogenates for the detection of ASFV genomic material by RRT-PCR. In this study, we compared CSFV genome detection in paired spleen homogenates and spleen swabs generated using 49 frozen and 33 fresh spleen samples collected from experimentally inoculated pigs with acute infection. The results show that the CSFV genome detection in spleen swabs is comparable to that in spleen homogenates. The study also demonstrated that the CSFV genomic material can be detected in spleen swabs during early CSFV infections, and the viruses can be successfully isolated from the swabs. The use of spleen swabs instead of spleen tissue homogenates for CSF detection will reduce labor, decrease costs associated with reporting, and increase the diagnostic throughput.

Indexed as

Classical Swine FeverClassical Swine Fever VirusHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysSpleenAnimalsGenome, ViralReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySwineclassical swine feverdetectionhigh-throughputlaboratoryRRT-PCRspleen swabs

Identifiers

PMID40872277
PMCPMC12389663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.