ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancing Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis: Potential of MPT64 Immunochemistry-Based Antigen Detection Test in a High-TB, Low-HIV Endemic Setting.
Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occurrence of drug resistance, associated risk factors, and expression of cytokine IL-33 in human TB patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Underutilization of Bacteriological Testing in Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Single-center Study from Mardin, Türkiye.Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) remains diagnostically challenging due to its paucibacillary nature and variable presentation. Xpert and culture are limited in EPTB diagnosis due to sampling challenges, low sensitivity, and long turnaround times. This study evaluated the performance of the MPT64 antigen detection test for diagnosing EPTB, particularly tuberculous lymphadenitis (TBLN) and tuberculous pleuritis (TBP), in a high-TB, low-HIV setting. Conducted at Gulab-Devi Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, this study evaluated the MPT64 test's performance against conventional diagnostic methods, including culture, histopathology, and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Lymph node biopsies were collected, and cell blocks were made from aspirated pleural fluid from patients clinically presumed to have EPTB. Of 338 patients, 318 (94%) were diagnosed with EPTB. For TBLN, MPT64 demonstrated higher sensitivity (84%) than Xpert (48%); for TBP, the sensitivity was 51% versus 7%, respectively. Among histopathology-confirmed TBLN cases, MPT64 outperformed both culture and Xpert (85% vs. 58% and 47%). Due to the low number of non-TB cases, specificity could not be reliably assessed. The MPT64 test shows promise as a rapid, sensitive diagnostic tool for EPTB, particularly TBLN, in routine settings. While sensitivity is notably superior to Xpert, further studies are needed to evaluate its specificity and broader diagnostic utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.