Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872046›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Improved WOA-DBSCAN Online Clustering Algorithm for Radar Signal Data Streams.

Haidong Wan, Cheng Lu, Yongpeng Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haidong WanSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China.
Cheng LuSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China.
Yongpeng CuiSchool of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xian 710071, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7263-2216

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the pulsed data streams emitted by multiple signal sources that generate aliasing, traditional density clustering algorithms have the problems of poor clustering effect, heavy reliance on manual experience to set the parameters, and the need to carry out density clustering every time new data are input, resulting in a huge amount of computation. Therefore, an online density clustering algorithm based on the improved golden sine whale optimization is proposed. First, by adding new parameters to the density clustering algorithm, the neighborhood is changed from a single parameter Eps to a joint decision of the parameters Eps and θ, which avoids cross-cluster expansion by more flexibly delimiting the neighborhood range. The improved golden sine whale optimization algorithm is then used to obtain the optimal parameter solution of the DBSCAN algorithm. Finally, the idea of flow clustering is introduced to determine whether a pulse belongs to a valid library, an outlier library, or an inactive library by comparing the distance between the input pulse and each cluster center, effectively reducing the number of pulses required for analysis. The experiment proves that the algorithm improves the sorting accuracy by 57.7% compared to the DBSCAN algorithm and 37.8% compared to the WOA-DBSCAN algorithm.

Indexed as

data flowDBSCAN algorithmimproved whale optimization algorithmonline sortingsignal sorting

Identifiers

PMID40872046
PMCPMC12389958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.