ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Open Source Validation System for Continuous Arterial Blood Pressure Measuring Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advancement of sensor technologies enables the measurement of high-quality continuous blood pressure signals, which has become an important area in healthcare. The development of such application-specific sensors can be time-consuming, expensive, and difficult to test or validate with known and consistent waveforms. In this manuscript, an open-source blood pressure waveform simulator with a Python validation package is described. The core part, a 3D-printed cam, can be generated based on real blood pressure waveforms. The validation software framework compares in detail the waveform used to design the cam with the time series from the sensor being validated. The simulator was validated using a 3D force sensor. The RMSE of accuracy was 1.94 (44)-2.74 (63)%, and the Pearson correlation with the nominal signal was 99.84 (13)-99.39 (18)%. As for precision, the RMSE of the repeatability of cam rotations was 1.53 (71)-2.13 (116)% and the Pearson correlation was 99.85 (16)-99.59 (57)%. The presented simulator proved to be robust and accurate in short- and long-term use, as it produced the signal waveform reliably and with high fidelity. It reduces development costs for early-stage sensor development and research, offering a solution that is easy to manufacture yet capable of continuously outputting human arterial blood pressure waveforms spanning multiple consecutive cardiac cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.