Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872023›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Time and Frequency Domain Analysis of IMU-Based Orientation Estimation Algorithms with Comparison to Robotic Arm Orientation as Reference.

Ruslan Sultan, Steffen Greiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruslan SultanInstitute of Management and Technology, Hochschule Osnabrück, Kaiserstr. 10c, 49809 Lingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-3821-1693
Steffen GreiserInstitute of Management and Technology, Hochschule Osnabrück, Kaiserstr. 10c, 49809 Lingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-5609-6180

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR) 03FHP180AGerman Federal Ministry of Transport (BMV) 19OI23014C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work focuses on time and frequency domain analyses of IMU-based orientation estimation algorithms, including indirect Kalman (IKF), Madgwick (MF), and complementary (CF) filters. Euler angles and quaternions are used for orientation representation. A 6-DoF IMU is attached to a 6-joint UR5e robotic arm, with the robot's orientation serving as the reference. Robotic arm data is obtained via an RTDE interface and IMU data via a CAN bus. Test signals include pose sequences, which are big-amplitude, slowly changing signals used to evaluate stationary and low-dynamics responses in the time domain, and small-amplitude, fast-changing generalized binary noise (GBN) signals used to evaluate dynamic responses in the frequency domain. To prevent poor filters' performance, their parameters are tuned. In the time domain, RMSE and MaxAE are calculated for roll and pitch. In the frequency domain, composite frequency response and coherence are calculated using the Ockier method. RMSEs are computed for response magnitude and coherence, and averaged equivalent time delay (AETD) is derived from the response phase. In the time domain, MF and CF show the best overall performance. In the frequency domain, they again perform similarly well. IKF consistently performs the worst in both domains but achieves the lowest AETD.

Indexed as

composite coherencecomposite frequency responsefrequency domain evaluationinertial measurement unitorientation estimationrobotic armsensor fusiontime domain evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40872023
PMCPMC12389982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.