ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Time and Frequency Domain Analysis of IMU-Based Orientation Estimation Algorithms with Comparison to Robotic Arm Orientation as Reference.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work focuses on time and frequency domain analyses of IMU-based orientation estimation algorithms, including indirect Kalman (IKF), Madgwick (MF), and complementary (CF) filters. Euler angles and quaternions are used for orientation representation. A 6-DoF IMU is attached to a 6-joint UR5e robotic arm, with the robot's orientation serving as the reference. Robotic arm data is obtained via an RTDE interface and IMU data via a CAN bus. Test signals include pose sequences, which are big-amplitude, slowly changing signals used to evaluate stationary and low-dynamics responses in the time domain, and small-amplitude, fast-changing generalized binary noise (GBN) signals used to evaluate dynamic responses in the frequency domain. To prevent poor filters' performance, their parameters are tuned. In the time domain, RMSE and MaxAE are calculated for roll and pitch. In the frequency domain, composite frequency response and coherence are calculated using the Ockier method. RMSEs are computed for response magnitude and coherence, and averaged equivalent time delay (AETD) is derived from the response phase. In the time domain, MF and CF show the best overall performance. In the frequency domain, they again perform similarly well. IKF consistently performs the worst in both domains but achieves the lowest AETD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.