Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872011›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

AI-Powered Structural Health Monitoring Using Multi-Type and Multi-Position PZT Networks.

Hasti Gharavi, Farshid Taban, Soroush Korivand, Nader Jalili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hasti GharaviDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75205, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-9840-7442
Farshid TabanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75205, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-6221-736X
Soroush KorivandDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7407-8159
Nader JaliliDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0868-801X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concrete compressive strength is a critical property for structural performance and construction scheduling. Traditional non-destructive testing (NDT) methods, such as rebound hammer and ultrasonic pulse velocity, offer limited reliability and resolution, particularly at early ages. This study presents an AI-powered structural health monitoring (SHM) framework that integrates multi-type and multi-position piezoelectric (PZT) sensor networks with machine learning for in situ prediction of concrete compressive strength. Signals were collected from various PZT types positioned on the top, middle, bottom, and surface sides of concrete cubes during curing. A series of machine learning models were trained and evaluated using both the full and selected feature sets. Results showed that combining multiple PZT types and locations significantly improved prediction accuracy, with the best models achieving up to 95% classification accuracy using only the top 200 features. Feature importance and PCA analyses confirmed the added value of sensor heterogeneity. This study demonstrates that multi-sensor AI-enhanced SHM systems can offer a practical, non-destructive solution for real-time strength estimation, enabling earlier and more reliable construction decisions in line with industry standards.

Indexed as

AIcompressive strengthearly-age concretemachine learningnon-destructive testingpiezoelectric sensorsensor networksstructural health monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40872011
PMCPMC12389806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.