Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872006›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

AI-Generated Fall Data: Assessing LLMs and Diffusion Model for Wearable Fall Detection.

Sana Alamgeer, Yasine Souissi, Anne Ngu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sana AlamgeerDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6472-7570
Yasine SouissiCollege of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-8241-4961
Anne NguDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5877-0230

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) under the Smart and1102 Connected Health (SCH) Program 21223749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training fall detection systems is challenging due to the scarcity of real-world fall data, particularly from elderly individuals. To address this, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating synthetic fall data. This study evaluates text-to-motion (T2M, SATO, and ParCo) and text-to-text models (GPT4o, GPT4, and Gemini) in simulating realistic fall scenarios. We generate synthetic datasets and integrate them with four real-world baseline datasets to assess their impact on fall detection performance using a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model. Additionally, we compare LLM-generated synthetic data with a diffusion-based method to evaluate their alignment with real accelerometer distributions. Results indicate that dataset characteristics significantly influence the effectiveness of synthetic data, with LLM-generated data performing best in low-frequency settings (e.g., 20 Hz) while showing instability in high-frequency datasets (e.g., 200 Hz). While text-to-motion models produce more realistic biomechanical data than text-to-text models, their impact on fall detection varies. Diffusion-based synthetic data demonstrates the closest alignment to real data but does not consistently enhance model performance. An ablation study further confirms that the effectiveness of synthetic data depends on sensor placement and fall representation. These findings provide insights into optimizing synthetic data generation for fall detection models.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsArtificial IntelligenceWearable Electronic DevicesAccelerometryAlgorithmsHumansdiffusion modelsfall detectionlarge language modelssynthetic data generationtext-to-motion generationtext-to-text generationtime-series analysis

Identifiers

PMID40872006
PMCPMC12390476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.