ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Pain State Classification of Stiff Knee Joint Using Electromyogram for Robot-Based Post-Fracture Rehabilitation Training.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knee joint stiffness occurs and severely limits its range of motion (ROM) after facture around the knee. During mobility training, knee joints need to be flexed to the maximum angle position (maxAP) that can induce pain at an appropriate level in order to pull apart intra-articular adhesive structures while avoiding secondary injuries. However, the maxAP varies with training and is mostly determined by the pain level of patients. In this study, the feasibility of utilizing electromyogram (EMG) activities to detect maxAP was investigated. Specifically, the maxAP detection was converted into a binary classification between pain level three of the numerical rating scales (pain) and below (painless) according to clinical requirements. Firstly, 12 post-fracture patients with knee joint stiffness participated in Experiment I, with a therapist performing routine mobility training and EMG signals being recorded from knee flexors and extensors. The results showed that the extracted EMG features were significantly different between the pain and painless states. Then, the maxAP estimation performance was tested on a knee rehabilitation robot in Experiment II, with another seven patients being involved. The support vector machine and random forest models were used to classify between pain and painless states and obtained a mean accuracy of 87.90% ± 4.55% and 89.10% ± 4.39%, respectively, leading to an average estimation bias of 6.5° ± 5.1° and 4.5° ± 3.5°. These results indicated that the pain-induced EMG can be used to accurately classify pain states for the maxAP estimation in post-fracture mobility training, which can potentially facilitate the application of robotic techniques in fracture rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.