ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Comprehensive Evaluation of IoT Cloud Platforms: A Feature-Driven Review with a Decision-Making Tool.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Two-Stage VM Migration Framework for Power-Constrained Data Center Load Scheduling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has led to a growing ecosystem of Cloud Platforms designed to manage, process, and analyze IoT data. Selecting the optimal IoT Cloud Platform is a critical decision for businesses and developers, yet it presents a significant challenge due to the diverse range of features, pricing models, and architectural nuances. This manuscript presents a comprehensive, feature-driven review of twelve prominent IoT Cloud Platforms, including AWS IoT Core, IoT on Google Cloud Platform, and Microsoft Azure IoT Hub among others. We meticulously analyze each platform across nine key features: Security, Scalability and Performance, Interoperability, Data Analytics and AI/ML Integration, Edge Computing Support, Pricing Models and Cost-effectiveness, Developer Tools and SDK Support, Compliance and Standards, and Over-The-Air (OTA) Update Capabilities. For each feature, platforms are quantitatively scored (1-10) based on an in-depth assessment of their capabilities and offerings at the time of research. Recognizing the dynamic nature of this domain, we present our findings in a two-dimensional table to provide a clear comparative overview. Furthermore, to empower users in their decision-making process, we introduce a novel, web-based tool for evaluating IoT Cloud Platforms, called the "IoT Cloud Platforms Selector". This interactive tool allows users to assign personalized weights to each feature, dynamically calculating and displaying weighted scores for each platform, thereby facilitating a tailored selection process. This research provides a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and organizations seeking to navigate the complex landscape of IoT Cloud Platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.