ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
REEV SENSE IMUs for Gait Analysis in Stroke: A Clinical Study on Lower Limb Kinematics.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human gait analysis is essential for clinical evaluation and rehabilitation monitoring, particularly in post-stroke individuals, where joint kinematics provide valuable insights into motor recovery. While optical motion capture (OMC) is the gold standard, its high cost and restricted use in laboratory settings limit its accessibility. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of REEV SENSE, a novel magnetometer-free inertial measurement unit (IMU), in capturing knee and ankle joint angles during overground walking in post-stroke individuals using assistive devices. Twenty participants with chronic stroke walked along a 10-m walkway with their usual assistive device (cane or walker), while joint kinematics were simultaneously recorded using OMC and IMUs. Agreement between the systems was assessed using the mean absolute error, root mean square error, 95% confidence intervals, and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Knee angles measured with the IMUs showed a strong correlation with the OMC (r > 0.9) and low errors (MAE < 5°), consistent with clinical acceptability. Ankle angle accuracy was lower for participants using walkers, while knee measurements remained stable regardless of the assistive device. These findings demonstrate that REEV SENSE IMUs provide clinically relevant kinematic data and support their use as a practical wearable tool for gait analysis in real-world or remote clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.