ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Direct Nanoparticle Sensing in Liquids with Free-Space Excited Optical Whispering-Gallery-Mode Microresonators.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced Light-Matter Interaction in Porous Silicon Microcavities Structurally Optimized Using Theoretical Simulation and Experimental Validation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whispering-gallery-mode (WGM) microresonators are amongst the most promising optical sensors for detecting bio-chemical targets. A number of laser interrogation methods have been proposed and demonstrated over the last decade, based on scattering and absorption losses or resonance splitting and shift, harnessing the high-quality factor and ultra-small volume of WGMs. Actually, regardless of the sensitivity enhancement, their practical sensing operation may be hampered by the complexity of coupling devices as well as the signalprocessing required to extract the WGM response. Here, we use a silica microsphere immersed in an aqueous environment and efficiently excite optical WGMs with a free-space visible laser, thus collecting the relevant information from the transmitted and back-scattered light without any optical coupler, fiber, or waveguide. We show that a 640-nm diode laser, actively frequency-locked on resonance, provides real-time, fast sensing of dielectric nanoparticles approaching the surface with direct analog readout. Thanks to our illumination scheme, the sensor can be kept in water and operate for days without degradation or loss of sensitivity. Diverse noise contributions are carefully considered and quantified in our system, showing a minimum detectable particle size below 1 nm essentially limited by the residual laser microcavity jitter. Further analysis reveals that the inherent laserfrequency instability in the short, -mid-term operation regime sets an ultimate bound of 0.3 nm. Based on this work, we envisage the possibility to extend our method in view of developing new viable approaches for detection of nanoplastics in natural water without resorting to complex chemical laboratory methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.