ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Ensemble Learning Framework for Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GMoE-AD: Generalized Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection via Mixture-of-Experts and Domain-Invariant Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The inherent limitations of individual AI models underscore the need for robust anomaly detection techniques for securing autonomous driving systems. To address these limitations, we propose a comprehensive ensemble learning framework specifically designed for anomaly detection in autonomous driving systems. We comprehensively assess the effectiveness of ensemble learning models for detecting anomalies in autonomous vehicle datasets, focusing primarily on the VeReMi and Sensor datasets. Ensemble techniques are rigorously evaluated against individual models on binary and multiclass classification tasks. The analysis reveals that ensemble models consistently outperform individual models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, false positive rates, and F1-score. On the VeReMi dataset, ensembles achieve high performance for binary classification, with a maximum accuracy of 0.80 and F1-score of 0.86, surpassing single models. For the Sensor dataset, ensemble models like CatBoost exhibit perfect accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, exceeding single models by 11% in accuracy. In VeReMi multiclass classification, Stacking and Blending gave a 5% increase in accuracy compared to single models. Moreover, XGBoost and CatBoost demonstrate perfect recall. Our proposed method enhanced performance despite the increased runtime required by ensemble models. In evaluating false positive rates, ensemble learning demonstrated significant gains, reducing false positives and thereby enhancing overall system reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.