ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Capillary Flow Profile Analysis on Paper-Based Microfluidic Chips for Classifying Astringency Intensity.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Astringency, a complex oral sensation resulting from interactions between mucin and polyphenols, remains difficult to quantify in portable field settings. Therefore, quantifying the aggregation through interactions can enable the classification of the astringency intensity, and assessing the capillary action driven by the surface tension offers an effective approach for this purpose. This study successfully replicates tannic acid (TA)-mucin aggregation on a paper-based microfluidic chip and utilizes machine learning (ML) to analyze the resulting capillary flow dynamics. Aggregates formed by mixing mucin with TA solutions at three concentrations showed that higher TA levels led to greater aggregation, consequently reducing the capillary flow rates. The flow dynamics were consistently recorded using a smartphone mounted within a custom 3D-printed frame equipped with a motorized sample loading system, ensuring standardized experimental conditions. Among eight trained ML models, the support vector machine (SVM) demonstrated the highest classification accuracy at 95.2% in distinguishing the astringency intensity levels. Furthermore, fitting the flow data to a theoretical capillary flow equation allowed for the extraction of a single coefficient as an input feature, which achieved comparable classification performance, validating the simplified feature extraction strategy. This method was also feasible even with only a portion of the initial data. This approach is simple and cost-effective and can potentially be developed into a portable system, making it useful for field analysis of various liquid samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.