Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40871915›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Multi-Sensor Fusion-Based Localization Method for a Magnetic Adhesion Wall-Climbing Robot.

Xiaowei Han, Hao Li, Nanmu Hui, Jiaying Zhang, Gaofeng Yue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaowei HanSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China.
Hao LiSchool of Intelligent Science and Information Engineering, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China.
Nanmu HuiSchool of Intelligent Science and Information Engineering, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China.
Jiaying ZhangSchool of Intelligent Science and Information Engineering, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China.
Gaofeng YueSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China.

Funding

This work was supported by the Liaoning Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project 2023JH2/101300205 and the Shenyang Science and Technology Plan Project 23-407-3-33 23-407-3-33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the decline in the localization accuracy of magnetic adhesion wall-climbing robots operating on large steel structures, caused by visual occlusion, sensor drift, and environmental interference, this study proposes a simulation-based multi-sensor fusion localization method that integrates an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), Wheel Odometry (Odom), and Ultra-Wideband (UWB). An Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) is employed to integrate IMU and Odom measurements through a complementary filtering model, while a geometric residual-based weighting mechanism is introduced to optimize raw UWB ranging data. This enhances the accuracy and robustness of both the prediction and observation stages. All evaluations were conducted in a simulated environment, including scenarios on flat plates and spherical tank-shaped steel surfaces. The proposed method maintained a maximum localization error within 5 cm in both linear and closed-loop trajectories and achieved over 30% improvement in horizontal accuracy compared to baseline EKF-based approaches. The system exhibited consistent localization performance across varying surface geometries, providing technical support for robotic operations on large steel infrastructures.

Indexed as

Extended Kalman Filter (EKF)localizationmagnetic adhesion wall-climbing robotmulti-sensor fusionresidual weighting

Identifiers

PMID40871915
PMCPMC12390187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.