ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Scatterometry-Based Monitoring of Laser-Induced Periodic Surface Structures on Stainless Steel.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring of laser-based processes is essential for ensuring the quality of produced surface structures and for maintaining the process stability and reproducibility. Optical methods based on scatterometry are attractive for industrial monitoring as they are fast, non-contact, non-destructive, and can resolve features down to the sub-microscale. Here, Laser-Induced Periodic Surface Structures (LIPSS) are produced on stainless steel using ultrashort laser pulses in combination with a polygon scanning system. After the process, the fabricated LIPSS features are characterized by microscopy methods and with an optical setup based on scatterometry. Images of the diffraction patterns are collected and the intensity distribution analyzed and compared to the microscopy results in order to estimate the LIPSS height, spatial period, and regularity. The resulting analysis allows us to study LIPSS formation development, even when its characteristic diffraction pattern gradually changes from a double-sickle shape to a diffuse cloud. The scatterometry setup could be used to infer LIPSS height up to 420 nm, with an estimated average error of 7.7% for the highest structures and 11.4% in the whole working range. Periods estimation presents an average error of ~5% in the range where LIPSS are well-defined. In addition, the opening angle of the LIPSS was monitored and compared with regularity measurements, indicating that angles exceeding a certain threshold correspond to surfaces where sub-structures dominate over LIPSS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.