ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development and Implementation of an IoT-Enabled Smart Poultry Slaughtering System Using Dynamic Object Tracking and Recognition.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Catch damage in broiler chickens: a systematic review of injury assessment methods and their limitations.Poultry science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With growing global attention on animal welfare and food safety, humane and efficient slaughtering methods in the poultry industry are in increasing demand. Traditional manual inspection methods for stunning broilers need significant expertise. Additionally, most studies on electrical stunning focus on white broilers, whose optimal stunning conditions are not suitable for red-feathered Taiwan chickens. This study aimed to implement a smart, safe, and humane slaughtering system designed to enhance animal welfare and integrate an IoT-enabled vision system into slaughter operations for red-feathered Taiwan chickens. The system enables real-time monitoring and smart management of the poultry stunning process using image technologies for dynamic object tracking recognition. Focusing on red-feathered Taiwan chickens, the system applies dynamic tracking objects with chicken morphology feature extraction based on the YOLO-v4 model to accurately identify stunned and unstunned chickens, ensuring compliance with animal welfare principles and improving the overall efficiency and hygiene of poultry processing. In this study, the dynamic tracking object recognition system comprises object morphology feature detection and motion prediction for red-feathered Taiwan chickens during the slaughtering process. Images are firsthand data from the slaughterhouse. To enhance model performance, image amplification techniques are integrated into the model training process. In parallel, the system architecture integrates IoT-enabled modules to support real-time monitoring, sensor-based classification, and cloud-compatible decisions based on collections of visual data. Prior to image amplification, the YOLO-v4 model achieved an average precision (AP) of 83% for identifying unstunned chickens and 96% for identifying stunned chickens. After image amplification, AP improved significantly to 89% and 99%, respectively. The model achieved and deployed a mean average precision (mAP) of 94% at an IoU threshold of 0.75 and processed images at 39 frames per second, demonstrating its suitability for IoT-enabled real-time dynamic tracking object recognition in a real slaughterhouse environment. Furthermore, the YOLO-v4 model for poultry slaughtering recognition in transient stability, as measured by training loss and validation loss, outperforms the YOLO-X model in this study. Overall, this smart slaughtering system represents a practical and scalable application of AI in the poultry industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.