Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40871842›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Using Wearable Sensors to Identify Home and Community-Based Movement Using Continuous and Straight Line Stepping Time.

Lauren Gracey-McMinn, David Loudon, Alix Chadwell, Samantha Curtin, Chantel Ostler, Malcolm Granat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren Gracey-McMinnCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UK.
David LoudonPAL Technologies Ltd., Glasgow G4 0TQ, UK.
Alix ChadwellSchool of Healthcare Enterprise and Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9101-5202
Samantha CurtinCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UK.
Chantel OstlerPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8267-2892
Malcolm GranatCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0722-2760

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S02249X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective measurement of community participation is essential for evaluating functional recovery and intervention outcomes in clinical populations, yet current methods rely heavily on subjective self-report measures. This study developed and validated a classification model to distinguish between home- and community-based activities using stepping and lying data from activPAL devices. Twenty-four healthy participants wore activPAL 4+ monitors continuously while completing activity diaries over 7 days. A grid search optimisation approach tested threshold combinations for two stepping parameters: straight-line stepping time (SLS) and continuous stepping duration (CSD). The optimal model achieved 93.7% accuracy across 24-h periods using an SLS threshold of 26 s. The model demonstrated high precision with a median difference of just 7 min between the predicted and reported community participation time. Individual variation in model performance highlights the need for validation in diverse clinical cohorts. This represents a methodological advance in objective physical behaviour monitoring, enabling accurate classification of home and community activity from posture data. By identifying not just how much people move but where they move, the model supports more meaningful assessment of functional mobility and community participation. This can enhance clinical decision making, rehabilitation planning, and intervention evaluation. With potential for adoption in clinical pathways and public health policy, this approach addresses a key gap in measuring real-world recovery and independence.

Indexed as

Monitoring, AmbulatoryWearable Electronic DevicesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicMovementWalkingYoung Adultaccelerometryactivity classificationactivPALcommunity participationmobility assessmentobjective measurementphysical behaviour monitoringrehabilitation outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40871842
PMCPMC12389788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.