Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40871835›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Texture and Friction Classification: Optical TacTip vs. Vibrational Piezoeletric and Accelerometer Tactile Sensors.

Dexter R Shepherd, Phil Husbands, Andrew Philippides, Chris Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dexter R ShepherdAI Group, Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-1653-7816
Phil HusbandsAI Group, Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5164-4004
Andrew PhilippidesAI Group, Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5503-0467
Chris JohnsonAI Group, Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7137-7874

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S030964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tactile sensing is increasingly vital in robotics, especially for tasks like object manipulation and texture classification. Among tactile technologies, optical and electrical sensors are widely used, yet no rigorous direct comparison of their performance has been conducted. This paper addresses that gap by presenting a comparative study between a high-resolution optical tactile sensor (a modified TacTip) and a low-resolution electrical sensor combining accelerometers and piezoelectric elements. We evaluate both sensor types on two tasks: texture classification and coefficient of dynamic friction prediction. Various configurations and resolutions were explored, along with multiple machine learning classifiers to determine optimal performance. The optical sensor achieved 99.9% accuracy on a challenging texture dataset, significantly outperforming the electrical sensor, which reached 82%. However, for dynamic friction prediction, both sensors performed comparably, with only a 5~% accuracy difference. We also found that the optical sensor retained high classification accuracy even when image resolution was reduced to 25% of its original size, suggesting that ultra-high resolution is not essential. In conclusion, the optical sensor is the better choice when high accuracy is required. However, for low-cost or computationally efficient systems, the electrical sensor provides a practical alternative with competitive performance in some tasks.

Indexed as

electrical tactile sensingoptical tactile sensingsensor resolutiontexture classification

Identifiers

PMID40871835
PMCPMC12390442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.