ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Energy Evaluation and Passive Damage Detection for Structural Health Monitoring in Aerospace Structures Using Machine Learning Models.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for Structural Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) in aerospace engineering is more and more based on the use of Artificial Intelligence. In this manuscript machine learning algorithms were trained to identify and to characterize the structural effects of impacts on a typical aerospace aluminum panel. A significant experimental campaign was conducted to create suitable impact datasets (the vibrational behavior of the reinforced plate, acquired by piezo sensors). Shallow neural networks, properly trained, were applied to determine critical events affecting the operational conditions. The focus of the manuscript was double: on the severity of the event (a regression problem regarding impact energy) and on the detection of preexisting damage to monitored areas (a classification problem regarding the identification of damaged zones). The scope of this work was to demonstrate the validity of the machine learning approach as an SHM tool for impact effect characterization in a realistic aerospace structure (i.e., energy prediction with a percentage error never more than 10% and identification of previous damaged zones with an accuracy of more than 95%) and to demonstrate its computational efficiency despite the test complexity, provided that the selection of features is guided by a meaningful physical and mechanical interpretation of the underlying phenomena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.