Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40871785›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Advancing Cognitive Load Detection in Simulated Driving Scenarios Through Deep Learning and fNIRS Data.

Mehshan Ahmed Khan, Houshyar Asadi, Mohammad Reza Chalak Qazani, Ghazal Bargshady, Sam Oladazimi, Thuong Hoang, Ghazal Rahimzadeh, Zoran Najdovski, Lei Wei, Hirash Moradi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mehshan Ahmed KhanInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7380-8532
Houshyar AsadiInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia.
Mohammad Reza Chalak QazaniCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4814, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1839-029X
Ghazal BargshadyFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2557-7928
Sam OladazimiHermann-Hesse Str. 17, 72221 Haiterbach, Germany.
Thuong HoangInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7354-260X
Ghazal RahimzadehInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5927-3818
Zoran NajdovskiInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia.
Lei WeiInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8267-0283
Hirash MoradiBuilding Controls GmbH, Schießmauer 18, 92283 Lauterhofen, Germany.
Saeid NahavandiSwinburne Research, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shift from manual to conditionally automated driving, supported by Advanced Driving Assistance Systems (ADASs), introduces challenges, particularly increased crash risks due to human factors like cognitive overload. Driving simulators provide a safe and controlled setting to study these human factors under complex conditions. This study leverages Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) to dynamically assess cognitive load in a realistic driving simulator during a challenging night-time-rain scenario. Thirty-eight participants performed an auditory n-back task (0-, 1-, and 2-back) while driving, simulating multitasking demands. A sliding window approach was applied to the time-series fNIRS data to capture short-term fluctuations in brain activation. The data were analyzed using EEGNet, a deep learning model, with both overlapping and non-overlapping temporal segmentation strategies. Results revealed that classification performance is significantly influenced by the learning rate and windowing method. Notably, a learning rate of 0.001 yielded the highest performance, with 100% accuracy using overlapping windows and 97% accuracy with non-overlapping windows. These findings highlight the potential of combining fNIRS and deep learning for real-time cognitive load monitoring in simulated driving scenarios and demonstrate the importance of temporal modeling in physiological signal analysis.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingCognitionDeep LearningAdultBrainComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung Adultcognitive loaddeep learning modeldriving simulatorEEGNetfNIRS

Identifiers

PMID40871785
PMCPMC12390546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.