Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40871778›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Formalizing Permission to Delegate and Delegation with Policy Interaction.

Azan Hamad Alkhorem, Daniel Conte de Leon, Ananth A Jillepalli, Jia Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Azan Hamad AlkhoremDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8422-7947
Daniel Conte de LeonDepartment of Computer Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.
Ananth A JillepalliCollege of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0089-8263
Jia SongDepartment of Computer Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-6954-6822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of Internet of Things (IoT) intelligent systems, the latest research regarding delegation using an access control model has gained attention, reflecting the need for models to support more functionalities in relation to hierarchical delegation. With respect to delegation procedures within access control, issues arise after delegation concerning the permissions to others with respect to revocation. Redundancy and conflict arising from delegation can occur depending on the delegation policies used within the hierarchical structure. This article discusses implementation of positive delegation represented by "YES" and negative delegation represented by "NO". Furthermore, we also consider permission to delegate positively and negatively represented by (YES and NO). These challenges are addressed by creating additional features in a hierarchical policy model (HPol). The implementation was created using Python (ver. 3.10) code to verify the advantages of the approach, through experimentation under different scenarios. The model also has the capability to manage and adapt features of the Internet of Things (IoT) to a blockchain architecture, enhancing security and verification during the delegation process and increasing the scalability of Internet of Things (IoT) intelligent environment systems.

Indexed as

access control modelsconflict detectiondelegationpermissionpermission to delegateredundant

Identifiers

PMID40871778
PMCPMC12390146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.