ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Indoor Positioning Systems as Critical Infrastructure: An Assessment for Enhanced Location-Based Services.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vertex: A Semantic Graph-Based Indoor Navigation System with Vision-Language Landmark Verification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improving Visible Light Positioning Accuracy Using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) for Deep Learning Hyperparameter Updating in Received Signal Strength (RSS)-Based Convolutional Neural Network (CNN).Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the demand for context-aware services in smart environments continues to rise, Indoor Positioning Systems (IPSs) have evolved from auxiliary technologies into indispensable components of mission-critical infrastructure. This paper presents a comprehensive, multidimensional evaluation of IPSs through the lens of critical infrastructure, addressing both their technical capabilities and operational limitations across dynamic indoor environments. A structured taxonomy of IPS technologies is developed based on sensing modalities, signal processing techniques, and system architectures. Through an in-depth trade-off analysis, the study highlights the inherent tensions between accuracy, energy efficiency, scalability, and deployment cost-revealing that no single technology meets all performance criteria across application domains. A novel evaluation framework is introduced that integrates traditional performance metrics with emerging requirements such as system resilience, interoperability, and ethical considerations. Empirical results from long-term Wi-Fi fingerprinting experiments demonstrate the impact of temporal signal fluctuations, heterogeneity features, and environmental dynamics on localization accuracy. The proposed adaptive algorithm consistently outperforms baseline models in terms of Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), confirming its robustness under evolving conditions. Furthermore, the paper explores the role of collaborative and infrastructure-free positioning systems as a pathway to achieving scalable and resilient localization in healthcare, logistics, and emergency services. Key challenges including privacy, standardization, and real-world adaptability are identified, and future research directions are proposed to guide the development of context-aware, interoperable, and secure IPS architectures. By reframing IPSs as foundational infrastructure, this work provides a critical roadmap for designing next-generation indoor localization systems that are technically robust, operationally viable, and ethically grounded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.