ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Future Designs of Clinical Trials in Nephrology: Integrating Methodological Innovation and Computational Power.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Digital Health Technologies have been Used to Support Regulatory Drug Approval.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Investigation of the pathogenic variants induced Sjogren's syndrome in Turkish population.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical trials in nephrology have historically been hindered by significant challenges, including slow disease progression, patient heterogeneity, and recruitment difficulties. While recent therapeutic breakthroughs have transformed care, they have also created a 'paradox of success' by lowering baseline event rates, further complicating traditional trial designs. We hypothesize that integrating innovative trial methodologies with advanced computational tools is essential for overcoming these hurdles and accelerating therapeutic development in kidney disease. This narrative review synthesizes the literature on persistent challenges in nephrology trials and explores methodological innovations. It investigates the transformative impact of computational tools, specifically Artificial Intelligence (AI), techniques like Augmented Reality (AR) and Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks (CTGANs), in silico clinical trials (ISCTs) and Digital Health Technologies across the research lifecycle. Key methodological innovations include adaptive designs, pragmatic trials, real-world evidence, and validated surrogate endpoints. AI offers transformative potential in optimizing trial design, accelerating patient stratification, and enabling complex data analysis, while AR can improve procedural accuracy, and CTGANs can augment scarce datasets. ISCTs provide complementary capabilities for simulating drug effects and optimizing designs using virtual patient cohorts. The future of clinical research in nephrology lies in the synergistic convergence of methodological and computational innovation. This integrated approach offers a pathway for conducting more efficient, precise, and patient-centric trials, provided that critical barriers related to data quality, model validation, regulatory acceptance, and ethical implementation are addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.