Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40871691›Full record

ArticleNutrients2025

The Fourth Survey on the Activity of Human Milk Banks in Italy.

Giuseppe De Nisi, Guido E Moro, Sertac Arslanoglu, Amalia M Ambruzzi, Enrico Bertino, Augusto Biasini, Claudio Profeti, Guglielmo Salvatori, Paola Tonetto, Pasqua Anna Quitadamo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giuseppe De NisiBoard of Directors of AIBLUD (Italian Association of Donor Human Milk Banks), 20126 Milan, Italy.
Guido E MoroBoard of Directors of AIBLUD (Italian Association of Donor Human Milk Banks), 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3429-3257
Sertac ArslanogluDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul 34720, Türkiye.
Amalia M AmbruzziBoard of Directors of AIBLUD (Italian Association of Donor Human Milk Banks), 20126 Milan, Italy.
Enrico BertinoNeonatal Care Unit, University of Turin, City of Health and Science of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Augusto BiasiniBoard of Directors of AIBLUD (Italian Association of Donor Human Milk Banks), 20126 Milan, Italy.
Claudio ProfetiBoard of Directors of AIBLUD (Italian Association of Donor Human Milk Banks), 20126 Milan, Italy.
Guglielmo SalvatoriNeonatal Care Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Paola TonettoNeonatal Care Unit, University of Turin, City of Health and Science of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Pasqua Anna QuitadamoNeonatal Care Unit, IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3131-8700
Nicoletta DaneseNeonatal Care Unit, AULSS 8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.
The Members Of Aiblud Italian Association Of Donor Human Milk Banks

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScientific literature confirms the benefits of mother's own milk (MOM) for both term and preterm infants. The feeding of pathological newborns, in particular the very low birth weight infants (VLBWIs), is dependent on human milk. When MOM is not available, pasteurized donor human milk obtained from a recognized Human Milk Bank (HMB) is the best alternative. RESEARCH

aimsThis survey aims to evaluate the activity of human milk banks (HMBs) in Italy in the years 2023-2024.

methodsFollowing the previous three surveys performed in 2012, 2016, and 2022, a fourth survey related to 2023 and 2024 was planned in the year 2025. A questionnaire was sent to the 44 HMBs officially operating in Italy, with questions regarding their management and activity, in order to collect national-level data.

resultsAll 44 Italian HMBs (100%) responded to this survey. The collected data confirm the results of the previous surveys, confirming an optimal adherence to the Italian Ministerial Guidelines. Almost all the HMBs (96%) apply the principles of self-control and the HACCP system, while the home milk collection service still requires improvement. Only 68% of HMBs organize collection and transport of the donated milk from the donor's home to the bank. In addition, this survey shows the spreading of computerization in the management of the activities of HMBs: 36.4% make use of specific software that could lead to a greater availability of donor human milk for the neonatal centers in the future. The number of donors and the amount of donated milk increased consistently compared to the previous years.

conclusionsIn general, this survey shows an improvement in the results obtained in the three previous surveys, with a positive dissemination of the culture of human milk donation in Italy. The impressive response rate to the survey demonstrates the importance of a regular check-up of the activity of HMBs.

Indexed as

Milk BanksMilk, HumanFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightItalySurveys and Questionnairesbreast milkdonor milkhuman milkhuman milk banksinfant nutritionpreterm infants feeding

Identifiers

PMID40871691
PMCPMC12389247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.