Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40871641›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2025

The Effects of Protein Nutrition on Muscle Function in Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohamed A Mohamed, Brett Doleman, Bethan E Phillips, John P Williams

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohamed A MohamedCentre of Metabolism, Ageing and Physiology (COMAP), MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre of Musculoskeletal Ageing Research (CMAR) and Nottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby DE22 3DT, UK.
Brett DolemanCentre of Metabolism, Ageing and Physiology (COMAP), MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre of Musculoskeletal Ageing Research (CMAR) and Nottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby DE22 3DT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4707-4755
Bethan E PhillipsCentre of Metabolism, Ageing and Physiology (COMAP), MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre of Musculoskeletal Ageing Research (CMAR) and Nottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby DE22 3DT, UK.
John P WilliamsCentre of Metabolism, Ageing and Physiology (COMAP), MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre of Musculoskeletal Ageing Research (CMAR) and Nottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby DE22 3DT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundowing to altered protein metabolism during critical illness, skeletal muscles are utilised as a source of protein, with subsequent debilitating effects on both muscle structure and function. Protein nutrition has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in critically unwell patients; however, the impact on muscle function is less established. Therefore, the aim of this review was to systematically determine the effect of protein dose on skeletal muscle strength in critically ill patients.

methodswe searched five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, and PubMed) and clinical trial registers for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of non-pregnant, adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), which assessed the impact of different doses of protein nutrition on muscle strength. Studies investigating only muscle structure or with co-interventions were excluded. Six RCTs were eligible for inclusion, and five were suitable for meta-analysis.

resultsthere was a significant difference in skeletal muscle strength with higher versus lower protein intakes, with a mean difference of 2.36 kg (95% CI: 0.37-4.35). The mean difference in protein dose was 0.46 g/kg/d (95% CI: 0.29-0.64). Inconsistency was evident across the included studies, with risk of bias ranging from moderate to high.

conclusionmuscle strength of ICU patients does appear to be affected by different protein doses. However, trials focusing on muscle function are limited by number and quality, highlighting a clear need for future work.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessDietary ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthAdultFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDietary Proteinscritical illnessmuscle strengthprotein nutrition

Identifiers

PMID40871641
PMCPMC12389481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.