SynthesisNutrients2025
Associations of Birth Size with Physical and Cognitive Function in Men and Women 60 Years and Older-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between birth size, a marker of prenatal undernutrition, and both physical and cognitive function in individuals aged 60 years and older.
methodsWe searched the PubMed and Scopus databases up to November 2024 for prospective cohort studies that included data on birth size and physical or cognitive function in individuals aged 60 or older, excluding studies focused on preterm individuals. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E) tool was used to evaluate the bias of each included study. Fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023360823.
resultsTwenty-four articles met the eligibility criteria, with participant numbers ranging from 52 to 4000 (about 50% women) and an average age range of 60.9 to 78.4 years. Eight articles had a high risk of bias, while the remaining 16 presented some concerns. Three meta-analyses were conducted: two for grip strength and one for word fluency. Grip strength was positively associated with birth weight, both in an unadjusted analysis, which showed an increase of 1.88 kg (95% CI 1.19, 2.56), and in an analysis adjusted for age, sex, and height/body mass index, which showed an increase of 1.15 kg (95% CI 0.71, 1.59). Word fluency also displayed a positive association with birth weight, with an increase of 0.62 words per minute (95% CI 0.15, 1.10).
conclusionsSmaller birth size, indicative of prenatal undernutrition, is associated with diminished physical and cognitive function in later life. These results highlight the importance of identifying individuals born small as a vulnerable group and implementing lifelong strategies to promote healthy aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.