ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Chemical Versus Biological Approaches to the Synthesis of Lactobionic Acid: A Review.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomedical Hydrogel Bio-Adhesive Based on Lactobionic Acid Conjugated Polyethylenimine and Oxidized Dextran with Antioxidant Activity and Cytocompatibility.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Enzyme Co-Immobilization on Precipitated Silica for Sustainable Lactobionic Acid Production.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From acidification to multi-targeted cellular modulation: dual impact of hydroxy acids on the skin microbiota and the epidermal barrier.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lactobionic acid, widely used in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food industries, is produced through chemical and biological methods, each with distinct advantages and challenges. This review examines the key approaches to its production, highlighting the chemical oxidation of lactose and biotechnological processes using microbial and enzymatic systems. Chemical methods offer high yields and rapid production but are often hindered by environmental concerns and lower product purity. In contrast, biological methods provide eco-friendly alternatives with superior product quality, albeit with limitations in scalability and higher initial costs. The comparison in this overview focuses on productivity, cost efficiency, purity, and environmental impacts, underscoring the potential of biological methods to align with sustainability goals. This review highlights further advances in biological approaches and explores hybrid solutions that combine the strengths of both methods for optimal lactobionic acid production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.