ArticlePolymers2025
Effect of Surface-Modified Mica in Hybrid Filler Systems on the Curing and Mechanical Behavior of Ethylene-Propylene-Diene Monomer (EPDM)/Butadiene Rubber (BR) Blend.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Polyamide 11 Composites with Surface-Activated Intact Mica Structures for Advanced Applications.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of hybrid filler systems comprising carbon black (CB), mica, and surface-modified mica (SM) on the properties of ethylene-propylene-diene monomer (EPDM)/butadiene rubber (PB) composites. To reduce the environmental issues associated with CB, mica was incorporated as a partial substitute, and its compatibility with the rubber matrix was enhanced through surface modification using ureidopropyltrimethoxysilane (URE). The composites with hybrid filler systems and surface modification were evaluated in terms of curing behavior, crosslink density, mechanical and elastic properties, and dynamic viscoelasticity. Rheological analysis revealed that high mica loadings delayed vulcanization due to reduced thermal conductivity and accelerator adsorption, whereas SM composites maintained comparable curing performance. Swelling tests showed a reduction in crosslink density with increased unmodified mica content, while SM-filled samples improved the network density, confirming enhanced interfacial interaction. Mechanical testing demonstrated that the rubber compounds containing SM exhibited average improvements of 17% in tensile strength and 20% in toughness. In particular, the CB20/SM10 formulation achieved a well-balanced enhancement in tensile strength, elongation at break, and toughness, surpassing the performance of the CB-only system. Furthermore, rebound resilience and Tan δ analyses showed that low SM content reduced energy dissipation and improved elasticity, whereas excessive filler loadings led to increased hysteresis. The compression set results supported the thermal stability and recovery capacity of the SM-containing systems. Overall, the results demonstrated that the hybrid filler system incorporating URE-modified mica significantly enhanced filler dispersion and rubber-filler interaction, offering a sustainable and high-performance solution for elastomer composite applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.