ArticlePolymers2025
Influence of Material Selection on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Tracheal Stents for Surgical Applications.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Additive Manufacturing of Bioresorbable Tracheal Stents from PDO/PCL Blends: Effects of Composition and Processing on Structure and Properties.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Computational Framework for the Design and Mechanical Assessment of Biodegradable Airway Stents: Interaction with Rabbit Tracheal Tissue and Preliminary In Vivo Observations.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Effect of Voltage and Deposition Time on Surface Morphology, Mechanical Performance, and Corrosion Resistance of Chitosan-Nanohydroxyapatite Coatings.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endotracheal prosthesis placement is employed as a therapeutic intervention for tracheal lesions in cases where conventional surgical approaches are not feasible. The learning curve for endotracheal stent placement can vary depending on the type of stent, the training environment, and the clinician's prior experience; however, it is generally considered moderately complex. Inadequate practice can have serious consequences, as the procedure involves a critical area such as the airway. The main risks and complications associated with inadequate technique or improper execution can include stent migration, formation of granulation tissue or hyperplasia, tracheal or pulmonary infection, obstruction or fracture of the stent, hemorrhage and tracheal perforation, among others. The purpose of the present study is to summarize important information and evaluate the role of different material features in the 3D printing manufacturing of an appropriate tracheobronchial medical device, which should be as appropriate as possible to facilitate placement during surgical practice. A complex stent design was fabricated using three different biodegradable materials, polycaprolactone (PCL), polydioxanone (PDO), and polymer blend of polylactic acid/polycaprolactone (PLA/PCL), through additive manufacturing, specifically fused filament fabrication (FFF)3D printing. Parameter optimization of the 3D printing process was required for each material to achieve an adequate geometric quality of the stent. Experimental analyses were conducted to characterize the mechanical properties of the printed stents. Flexural strength and radial compression resistance were evaluated, with particular emphasis on radial force due to its clinical relevance in preventing collapse after implantation in the trachea. The results provide valuable insights into how material selection could influence device behavior during placement to support surgical requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.