ArticlePolymers2025
Synergistic Optimization of Polymer-Surfactant Binary Flooding for EOR: Core-Scale Experimental Analysis of Formulation, Slug Design, and Salinity Effect.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reservoir Equilibrium Development Method by Combined Conformance Control of Polymer/Gel-Dispersed Fluids.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Study on Enhanced Oil Recovery of Nanofluid-Polymer Binary Flooding Technology in Medium-High Permeability Reservoirs.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As conventional waterflooding enters mid-to-late stages, chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technologies such as polymer-surfactant binary flooding have emerged to address declining recovery rates. This study systematically investigates the synergistic effects of polymer-surfactant binary formulations through core-flooding experiments under varying concentrations, injection volumes, and salinity conditions. The optimal formulation, identified as 0.5% surfactant and 0.15% polymer, achieves a maximum incremental oil recovery of 42.19% with an interfacial tension (IFT) reduction to 0.007 mN/m. A 0.5 pore volume (PV) injection volume balances sweep efficiency and economic viability, while sequential slug design with surfactant concentration gradients demonstrates superior displacement efficacy compared with fixed-concentration injection. Salinity sensitivity analysis reveals that high total dissolved solids (TDS) significantly degrade viscosity, whereas low TDS leads to higher viscosity but only marginally enhances the recovery. These findings provide experimental evidence for optimizing polymer-surfactant flooding strategies in field applications, offering insights into balancing viscosity control, interfacial tension reduction, and operational feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.