ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Cross-Sectional Imaging of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls on CT and MR.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Worldwide prevalence ofNew microbes and new infections · 2026Review
- Molecular insights into salpingitis-induced infertility and ectopic pregnancy: pathogenesis, biomarkers, and translational perspectives.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Review
- Pelvic Inflammatory Disease With Presumptive Tubo-Ovarian Abscess Presenting With Rectal Spasm.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Global, Regional, and National Impact of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Changing Landscape from 1990 to 2021.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) encompasses a broad range of infection-induced inflammatory disorders of the female upper genital tract, commonly caused by ascending sexually transmitted infections. Diagnosis is often challenging because of nonspecific or absent symptoms and the overlap with other pelvic pathologies. While clinical and laboratory assessments are essential, cross-sectional imaging plays a pivotal role, especially in complicated, atypical, or equivocal cases. This review focuses on the typical and atypical imaging features of PID and highlights the crucial roles of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in its diagnostic evaluation. CT is frequently employed in emergency settings because of its widespread availability and ability to detect acute complications such as tubo-ovarian abscesses (TOA), peritonitis, or Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome. However, it is limited by ionizing radiation and suboptimal soft-tissue contrast. MRI provides superior tissue characterization and multiplanar imaging without radiation exposure. When combined with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), MRI achieves high diagnostic accuracy, particularly in differentiating PID from other entities such as endometriosis, adnexal tumors, and gastrointestinal or urinary tract diseases. This review also addresses PID in specific clinical contexts, including post-partum infection, post-assisted reproductive technologies (ART), intrauterine device (IUD) use, and chronic or recurrent forms. A comprehensive, multimodal imaging approach integrated with clinical findings is essential for timely diagnosis, effective treatment, and prevention of severe reproductive sequelae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.