Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40870515›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025

Coronary Angioplasty with Drug-Coated Balloons: Pharmacological Foundations, Clinical Efficacy, and Future Directions.

Valentin Chioncel, Flavius Gherasie, Alexandru Iancu, Anamaria-Georgiana Avram

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valentin ChioncelDepartment of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Flavius GherasieDepartment of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru IancuEmergency Clinical Hospital Dr. Bagdasar-Arseni, 041915 Bucharest, Romania.
Anamaria-Georgiana AvramEmergency Clinical Hospital Dr. Bagdasar-Arseni, 041915 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1742-3128

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have transformed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by delivering antiproliferative drugs directly to the arterial wall, offering a stent-less approach that mitigates the risks associated with permanent metallic implants. Initially developed for in-stent restenosis (ISR), DCBs have demonstrated robust efficacy in reducing neointimal hyperplasia and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates across diverse coronary lesions, including small vessel disease (SVD), de novo lesions, and complex anatomies such as bifurcation lesions. Paclitaxel-coated balloons have long been the cornerstone of DCB therapy due to their established clinical outcomes, but sirolimus-coated balloons are emerging as a promising alternative with potentially superior safety profiles and sustained drug release. The pharmacological mechanism of DCBs relies on rapid drug transfer during brief balloon inflation, achieving high local concentrations without residual foreign material. Landmark trials, such as BASKET-SMALL 2, RESTORE SVD, and AGENT IDE, have demonstrated comparable or non-inferior outcomes of DCBs versus drug-eluting stents (DESs) in specific settings, with lower rates of stent thrombosis and shorter dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) requirements. Despite these advances, challenges persist, including optimizing drug formulations, ensuring uniform delivery, and addressing calcified lesions. Ongoing research into novel coatings, dual-drug systems, and artificial intelligence (AI)-guided interventions is poised to redefine PCI strategies. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty, not limited to specific clinical scenarios such as in-stent restenosis, small vessel disease, or bifurcation lesions, highlighting their transformative role in coronary artery disease (CAD) management. Instead, it addresses the full spectrum of pharmacological principles, mechanisms of action, clinical indications, comparative efficacy across various coronary artery disease contexts, and future directions of DCBs.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoated Materials, BiocompatibleCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisDrug-Eluting StentsHumansPaclitaxelSirolimusTreatment OutcomeCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePaclitaxelSirolimusde novo lesionsdrug-coated balloonsin-stent restenosispaclitaxelpercutaneous coronary interventionsirolimussmall vessel disease

Identifiers

PMID40870515
PMCPMC12387977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.