ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
Coronary Angioplasty with Drug-Coated Balloons: Pharmacological Foundations, Clinical Efficacy, and Future Directions.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mid-term outcomes of using drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of large vesselCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
- Novel Hertz Contact Intravascular Lithotripsy: Could We Achieve More in Balloon-Based Calcium Modification?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Association of Thyroid Function With Restenosis and Long-Term Outcomes After Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Euthyroid Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Conservative management without routine bailout stent for non-flow-limiting dissection after DCB angioplasty: a prospective three-arm study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of drug coated balloon on left anterior descending artery stenosis at proximal to myocardial bridge.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Drug-coated balloons vs. drug-eluting stents for coronary artery disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with lesion-specific insights.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Paclitaxel- and Sirolimus-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Small-Vessel Coronary Disease and Drug-Coated Balloons: Time to Reconsider Our Strategy?Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Two-year real-world outcomes of coronary drug-coated balloon therapy: a retrospective comparative study of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-coated devices.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have transformed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by delivering antiproliferative drugs directly to the arterial wall, offering a stent-less approach that mitigates the risks associated with permanent metallic implants. Initially developed for in-stent restenosis (ISR), DCBs have demonstrated robust efficacy in reducing neointimal hyperplasia and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates across diverse coronary lesions, including small vessel disease (SVD), de novo lesions, and complex anatomies such as bifurcation lesions. Paclitaxel-coated balloons have long been the cornerstone of DCB therapy due to their established clinical outcomes, but sirolimus-coated balloons are emerging as a promising alternative with potentially superior safety profiles and sustained drug release. The pharmacological mechanism of DCBs relies on rapid drug transfer during brief balloon inflation, achieving high local concentrations without residual foreign material. Landmark trials, such as BASKET-SMALL 2, RESTORE SVD, and AGENT IDE, have demonstrated comparable or non-inferior outcomes of DCBs versus drug-eluting stents (DESs) in specific settings, with lower rates of stent thrombosis and shorter dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) requirements. Despite these advances, challenges persist, including optimizing drug formulations, ensuring uniform delivery, and addressing calcified lesions. Ongoing research into novel coatings, dual-drug systems, and artificial intelligence (AI)-guided interventions is poised to redefine PCI strategies. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty, not limited to specific clinical scenarios such as in-stent restenosis, small vessel disease, or bifurcation lesions, highlighting their transformative role in coronary artery disease (CAD) management. Instead, it addresses the full spectrum of pharmacological principles, mechanisms of action, clinical indications, comparative efficacy across various coronary artery disease contexts, and future directions of DCBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.