Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40870346›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Brain Oscillations and Autonomic Synthonization via Comodulation in Collaborative Negotiation.

Katia Rovelli, Carlotta Acconito, Laura Angioletti, Michela Balconi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katia RovelliInternational Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-7923
Carlotta AcconitoInternational Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1000-3489
Laura AngiolettiInternational Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3027-2272
Michela BalconiInternational Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8634-1951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between neural and physiological synthonization via comodulation (Synth) in dyadic exchanges centered on negotiation processes. In total, 13 dyads participated in a negotiation task with three phases: Initiation (IP), Negotiation Core (NCP), and Resolution (RP). Electroencephalographic (EEG) frequency bands (i.e., delta, theta, alpha) and autonomic responses (heart rate variability, HRV) were recorded. Synth was analyzed using Euclidean distance (EuDist) for EEG and autonomic indices. Significant Synth in delta, theta, and alpha bands in temporo-central and parieto-occipital regions was observed, indicating social cognitive alignment. HRV Synth was higher during the NCP than IP, suggesting better coordination. Based on this result, a cluster analysis was performed on HRV EuDist to identify distinct groups based on HRV, and eventually personality patterns, that revealed one cluster with higher Synth and reward sensitivity, and another with lower Synth and reward sensitivity. These findings show how neural and autonomic Synth enhances social cognition and emotional regulation.

Indexed as

autonomic responsesdecision-makingemotion regulationinter-brain connectivitynegotiationneural synthonization

Identifiers

PMID40870346
PMCPMC12385423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.