Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40870339›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Robust Hybrid Weighting Scheme Based on IQRBOW and Entropy for MCDM: Stability and Advantage Criteria in the VIKOR Framework.

Ali Erbey, Üzeyir Fidan, Cemil Gündüz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Entropy Method for Decision Making with Uncertainty.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali ErbeyDepartment of Computer Programming, Distance Education Vocational School, Usak University, Usak 64200, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0930-4081
Üzeyir FidanDepartment of Computer Programming, Distance Education Vocational School, Usak University, Usak 64200, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3451-4344
Cemil GündüzDepartment of Computer Programming, Distance Education Vocational School, Usak University, Usak 64200, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9814-7099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) environments characterized by uncertainty and data irregularities, the reliability of weighting methods becomes critical for ensuring robust and accurate decisions. This study introduces a novel hybrid objective weighting method-IQRBOW-E (Interquartile Range-Based Objective Weighting with Entropy)-which dynamically combines the statistical robustness of the IQRBOW method with the information sensitivity of Entropy through a tunable parameter β. The method allows decision-makers to flexibly control the trade-off between robustness and information contribution, enhancing the adaptability of decision support systems. A comprehensive experimental design involving ten simulation scenarios was implemented, in which the number of criteria, alternatives, and outlier ratios were varied. The IQRBOW-E method was integrated into the VIKOR framework and evaluated through average Q values, stability ratios, SRD scores, and the Friedman test. The results indicate that the proposed hybrid approach achieves superior decision stability and performance, particularly in data environments with increasing outlier contamination. Optimal β values were shown to shift systematically depending on data conditions, highlighting the model's sensitivity and adaptability. This study not only advances the methodological landscape of MCDM by introducing a parameterized hybrid weighting model but also contributes a robust and generalizable weighting infrastructure for modern decision-making under uncertainty.

Indexed as

decision support systemsentropy weightinghybrid weighting methodinterquartile rangemulti-criteria decision-makingoutlier robustness

Identifiers

PMID40870339
PMCPMC12385209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.