ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancing Prediction by Incorporating Entropy Loss in Volatility Forecasting.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose examining Heterogeneous Autoregressive (HAR) models using five different estimation techniques and four different estimation horizons to decide which performs better in terms of forecasting accuracy. Several different estimators are used to determine the coefficients of three selected HAR-type models. Furthermore, model lags, calculated using 5 min intraday data from the Standard & Poor's 500 (SPX) index and the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility (VIX) index as the sole exogenous variable, enrich the models. For comparison and evaluation of the experimental results, we use three metrics: Quasi-Likelihood (QLIKE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Squared Error (MSE). An empirical study reveals that the Entropy Loss Function consistently achieves the best QLIKE results in all the horizons, especially in the weekly horizon. On the other hand, the performance of the Robust Linear Model implies that it can provide an alternative to the Entropy Loss Function when considering the results of the MAE and MSE metrics. Moreover, research shows that adding more informative lags, such as Realized Quarticity for the Heterogeneous Autoregressive model yielding the Realized Quarticity (HARQ) model, and incorporating the VIX index further improve the general results of the models. The results of the proposed Entropy Loss Function and Robust Linear Model suggest that they successfully achieve significant forecasting accuracy for HAR models across multiple forecasting horizons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.