ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
CurveMark: Detecting AI-Generated Text via Probabilistic Curvature and Dynamic Semantic Watermarking.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) pose significant challenges to content authentication, as their sophisticated generation capabilities make distinguishing AI-produced text from human writing increasingly difficult. Current detection methods suffer from limited information capture, poor rate-distortion trade-offs, and vulnerability to adversarial perturbations. We present CurveMark, a novel dual-channel detection framework that combines probability curvature analysis with dynamic semantic watermarking, grounded in information-theoretic principles to maximize mutual information between text sources and observable features. To address the limitation of requiring prior knowledge of source models, we incorporate a Bayesian multi-hypothesis detection framework for statistical inference without prior assumptions. Our approach embeds imperceptible watermarks during generation via entropy-aware, semantically informed token selection and extracts complementary features from probability curvature patterns and watermark-specific metrics. Evaluation across multiple datasets and LLM architectures demonstrates 95.4% detection accuracy with minimal quality degradation (perplexity increase < 1.3), achieving 85-89% channel capacity utilization and robust performance under adversarial perturbations (72-94% information retention).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.