ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Analysis of the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Austenitic Stainless Steel 310 Manufactured via WAAM.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of Microstructure, Hardness, and Wear Behavior of Hardfacing Produced by Wire Laser Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hot Forging of DIN 8555 E6-UM-60 Alloy Produced by Directed Energy Deposition: Understanding the Metallurgical Effects.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Experimental Study on the Chemical Composition, Microstructure, Heat Treatment and Mechanical Properties of Steels for Special Knife Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to characterize austenitic stainless steel 310 produced by Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM), addressing a gap in the literature regarding this alloy. Microstructural, chemical, and mechanical analyses were performed. Optical and electron microscopy revealed a predominantly columnar grain structure with characteristic tracks along the deposition direction. Point and mapping EDS analyses indicated a homogeneous distribution of iron, chromium, and nickel; however, point measurements suggested a possible underestimation of nickel, likely due to high relative error. Tensile tests demonstrated anisotropic mechanical behavior, with yield strength meeting standards at 45° and 90°, but lower at 0°. Ultimate tensile strength and elongation were below conventional requirements, with a maximum elongation of 15% at 90°. Additionally, the sample exhibited a total porosity of approximately 0.89%, which contributes to the reduction in mechanical properties, especially in the direction parallel to the deposition tracks. Overall, the WAAM-produced 310 stainless steel presented a microstructure similar to hot-rolled and annealed AISI 310 steel, but with distinctive features related to the additive process, such as mechanical anisotropy and microstructural directionality. These limitations highlight the need for process optimization to improve mechanical performance but reinforce the alloy's structural potential in additive manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.