ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Analysis and Correction of the Shrinkage Prediction Model for Manufactured Sand Concrete.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Term Mechanical Properties, Drying Shrinkage, and Creep Behaviour of Manufactured-Sand Concrete in Plateau Regions: 1-Year Measurements and Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the continuous depletion of natural river sand resources and the escalating ecological degradation caused by excessive sand mining, manufactured sand has emerged as a sustainable and environmentally favorable alternative aggregate, playing an increasingly important role in the advancement of green construction materials. Nevertheless, the shrinkage behavior of manufactured sand concrete (MSC) exhibits significant deviations from that of conventional natural sand concrete due to differences in the material characteristics. Existing shrinkage prediction models-such as ACI 209, CEB-FIP 2010, B3, and GL 2000-fail to adequately incorporate the specific properties and substitution effects of manufactured sand, thereby limiting their predictive accuracy and applicability. To bridge this gap, the present study conducted a systematic evaluation of the four aforementioned classical shrinkage prediction models based on experimental data from MSC specimens incorporating varying replacement rates of manufactured sand. The findings revealed that models such as B3 and CEB-FIP 2010 neglected the influence of critical characteristics of manufactured sand-namely, particle morphology, gradation, and stone powder content-on the cementitious matrix and interfacial transition zone, which led to substantial prediction discrepancies. Accordingly, a nonlinear regression-based correction function was developed, introducing the manufactured sand content as a key influencing variable to recalibrate and enhance the ACI 209 and GL 2000 models for a more accurate application to MSC. The modified models exhibited markedly improved fitting performance and predictive robustness across the full range of manufactured sand replacement ratios (0-100%), thereby offering a more reliable framework for modeling the shrinkage development of MSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.