ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluation of PLA and PETG as 3D-Printed Reference Materials for Compressive Strength Testing.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid FFF-CNC Processing of PLA Fixtures with Gyroid Internal Structures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the feasibility of using 3D printing technology to fabricate reference materials for validating compressive strength measurements in construction laboratories. Polylactic acid (PLA) and polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG) were selected due to their widespread availability and use in fused deposition modeling (FDM). A series of cubic samples with varying infill levels and dimensions were printed and tested to evaluate the influence of infill density, temperature, and storage time on compressive strength. PLA samples exhibited higher compressive strength values (from 23.5 kN for 10% infill to 70.7 kN for 50% infill) and a steeper increase in strength with rising infill density compared to PETG (from 12.4 kN for 10% infill to 44.1 kN for 50% infill). However, PETG demonstrated superior stability over time, with significantly smaller increases in result variability after 31 days. The results confirm a strong linear correlation between infill level and compressive strength and indicate that even small fluctuations in ambient temperature can influence test outcomes. Despite PLA's initial mechanical advantage, PETG's aging resistance makes it a promising candidate for the development of durable and repeatable reference materials (increment of StD for PLA from 0.17 kN to 0.63 kN and 0.25 kN to 0.37 for PET-G). This research contributes to closing the gap in the availability of reliable mechanical reference materials for destructive testing, offering a novel application for 3D printing in quality control in civil engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.