ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Study on Laser Drilling of Micro-Holes Using a Breakthrough Detection Method.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Achieving high efficiency and quality in millisecond pulsed laser drilling of metallic through-holes is contingent on precise process control. This study introduces a penetration detection-based method to determine the pulse count threshold, effectively overcoming the limitations of conventional approaches. We systematically investigated the effects of pulse energy, defocus, and beam expansion ratio on the drilling of 3 mm thick 304 stainless steel and TC4 titanium alloy. The experiments revealed that for stainless steel 304, the minimum taper angle was achieved at a pulse energy of 2.2 J, a defocus amount of -0.5 mm, and a beam expansion ratio of 2.5. Additionally, relatively high drilling efficiency was observed when the pulse energy ranged from 2.6 to 2.8 J, the defocus amount was -1 to 0 mm, and the beam expansion ratio was 3 to 4. For titanium alloy TC4, the minimum taper angle was achieved at a pulse energy of 2.6 J, a defocus amount of -0.5 mm, and a beam expansion ratio of 3.5. High drilling efficiency was recorded when the pulse energy was 2.8 J, the defocus amount was -0.5 mm, and the beam expansion ratio ranged from 2.5 to 3. When stainless steel 304 and titanium alloy TC4 were processed using the same laser parameters, the drilling efficiency of stainless steel 304 was higher than that of titanium alloy TC4 under the same conditions. This work provides a practical process control strategy and a valuable parameter database for high-quality, efficient laser drilling of these industrially important metals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.