Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40869999›Full record

ReviewGenes2025

Tooth Decay: Genetic and Epigenetic Insights Driving the Development of Anti-Caries Vaccines.

Inès Bouaita, André Peixoto, Paulo Mascarenhas, Cristina Manso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Inès BouaitaEgas Moniz Dental Clinic (EMDC), Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz, Campus Universitário, Quinta da Granja, Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal.
André PeixotoCentro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz, Campus Universitário, Quinta da Granja, Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal.
Paulo MascarenhasCentro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz, Campus Universitário, Quinta da Granja, Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6584-1199
Cristina MansoCentro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz, Campus Universitário, Quinta da Granja, Monte de Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9881-3338

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental caries is now recognised as a multifactorial disease shaped by complex interactions among genetic, epigenetic, microbiological, environmental, and social factors. This narrative review synthesises recent findings on the influence of genetic and epigenetic factors on caries susceptibility, exploring implications for personalised prevention strategies, including novel vaccine approaches. Numerous gene polymorphisms in pathways related to enamel formation, saliva composition, immune response, and taste perception have been linked to increased caries risk, with some effects modulated by sex and tooth-specific factors. Early-life environmental exposures (diet, tobacco, and antibiotic use) have been demonstrated to further alter risk through epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation, microRNA regulation, and histone changes. The recognition of this landscape of inherited and acquired vulnerabilities has given rise to interest in innovative preventive measures. In particular, anti-caries vaccines targeting

Indexed as

Dental CariesEpigenesis, GeneticDNA MethylationHumansStreptococcus mutansVaccine Developmentanti-caries vaccinedental cariesepigenetic mechanismsgenetic susceptibility

Identifiers

PMID40869999
PMCPMC12385391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.