Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40869885›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake, Implementation and Barriers in Africa: A Scoping Review Protocol.

Silingene Joyce Ngcobo, Tracy Zhandire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Silingene Joyce NgcoboDiscipline of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3410-7167
Tracy ZhandireDiscipline of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1681-4821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite significant advancements in HIV prevention, Africa continues to bear a disproportionately high burden of new infections. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has demonstrated over 90% efficacy in preventing HIV acquisition when taken consistently; however, its implementation and uptake across African countries remain suboptimal.

objectiveThis scoping review aims to systematically map existing literature on PrEP uptake and implementation in Africa, identify key barriers and facilitators influencing access and adherence, examine targeted population groups, and explore policy and programmatic approaches to PrEP delivery across diverse African contexts.

methodsThe review will follow the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, refined by Levac et al., and will include comprehensive searches of electronic databases, grey literature, and official reports. Data will be thematically synthesized to identify research trends, gaps, and contextual variations. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: The findings will provide a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of PrEP implementation in Africa, highlighting research trends, contextual variations across countries, and gaps in service delivery and policy frameworks. This will inform future implementation strategies, guide evidence-based approaches to enhance PrEP uptake, and support policymaking to scale up effective interventions across diverse African settings, ultimately contributing to HIV prevention efforts on the continent.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAfricaHumansScoping Reviews as TopicAnti-HIV AgentsAfricaHIV preventionimplementationpre-exposure prophylaxisPrEPscoping review protocoluptake barriers

Identifiers

PMID40869885
PMCPMC12386350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.