Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40869884›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Chemical Hazards in Products of Animal Origin in Cambodia from 2000 to 2023: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shwe Phue San, Linda Nicolaides, Delia Grace, Tumnoon Charaslertrangsi, Chhoun Chamnan, Shetty Seetharama Thombathu, Ra Thorng, Leab Kong, Sreymom Noeurn, Kuok Fidero and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shwe Phue SanNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Medway ME4 4TB, UK.
Linda NicolaidesNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Medway ME4 4TB, UK.
Delia GraceNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Medway ME4 4TB, UK.
Tumnoon CharaslertrangsiScience Division, Mahidol University International College, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8053-0989
Chhoun ChamnanFisheries Administration, Phnom Penh 120101, Cambodia.
Shetty Seetharama ThombathuUnited Nations Industrial Development Organization, Phnom Penh 120101, Cambodia.
Ra ThorngUnited Nations Industrial Development Organization, Phnom Penh 120101, Cambodia.
Leab KongUnited Nations Industrial Development Organization, Phnom Penh 120101, Cambodia.
Sreymom NoeurnFisheries Administration, Phnom Penh 120101, Cambodia.
Kuok FideroMinistry of Industry, Science, Technology, and Innovation, Phnom Penh 120203, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0003-1067-9953
Che RatanaConsumer Protection Competition and Freud Repression Directorate General, Phenom Penh 12125, Cambodia.
Nazanin ZandNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Medway ME4 4TB, UK.
Rortana CheaNational Animal Health and Production Research Institute, General Directorate of Animal Health and Production, Phnom Penh 120603, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0002-3063-6398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical hazards in food present a significant health risk. The objective of our review is to understand health risks associated with chemical contaminants in products of animal origin (POAO) in Cambodia, where there is no known published study. We followed the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 23 reports were included for review. The findings are presented according to the PRISMA guidelines. The studies mostly focused on fishery products, with arsenic and mercury being the most frequently studied hazards. The evidence of banned substances such as chloramphenicol and certain organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), including chlordane and Mirex, was reported in fish and meat. Additionally, mercury levels were measured in beef, pork, viscera, and eggs, but the average concentration remained significantly below the hazard index. The average concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in smoked fish exceeded the EU limits, ranging from 0.034 to 17.2 mg/kg, with an average mean concentration of 1.92 mg/kg. The pooled geometric means of arsenic and mercury in fish were 0.40 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.25-0.66) and ~0.14 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.087 to 0.223), respectively. The health risk of mercury contamination in fishery products needs the attention of the risk managers. However, industrial contaminants such as polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and butyl tin in marine fishes were lower than those reported elsewhere, such as Japan. We discuss the implications of the findings for human health and national food control systems (NFCS), the capacity of different agencies to undertake chemical risk assessment, the utility of systematic literature reviews (SLRs) for risk assessment and communication in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and the need for further research.

Indexed as

Food ContaminationHazardous SubstancesMeatAnimalsCambodiaFishesHumansHazardous Substancesanimal productsCambodiachemical hazardsfood contaminationmeta-analysisrisk assessmentsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40869884
PMCPMC12386664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.