ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Risk Factors for Locomotive Syndrome in Brazilian Older Adults: A Nested Case-Control Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the risk factors for locomotive syndrome (LS) in Brazilian oldest old individuals. Study subjects were older adults aged ≥80 years who were cognitively healthy, independent for activities of daily living and had been followed since 2011 by a Brazilian cohort study entitled the Longevos Project. A nested case-control study evaluating demographic and clinical characteristics was conducted. Physical tests including the 5 times sit-to-stand, hand-grip strength, 4-m gait speed and two-step test were performed. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire short form (WHOQOL-BREF) and Numerical Rating Scale plus Verbal Rating Scale were applied to assess quality of life (QOL) and chronic pain (CP), respectively. LS was diagnosed using the Brazilian version of the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25-p), and sarcopenia by the SARC-F screening tool. The study sample included 52 participants, had a mean age of 89.3 years (±3.9 years) and was predominantly female (76.9%). Of this sample, 24 were diagnosed with LS and 28 were not. The prevalence of osteoporosis (20%), osteoarthritis (22%), depression (13%) and use of a walking device (14%) was higher in the LS group. Participants with LS had worse performance in physical tests. A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the main risk factors for LS as osteoporosis (OR 10.80, 95%CI 1.08-108.48) and presence of moderate-to-severe chronic musculoskeletal pain (OR 8.92, 95%CI 1.25-63.89).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.