ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
The Intersection of Socioeconomic and Environmental Factors in Aging: Insights from a Narrative Review.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic inequalities in functional ageing trajectories in England and Canada: A comparative longitudinal cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Epigenetic vulnerability in endocrine disruption: bridging mechanisms, models, and environmental inequities.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Review
- How We Sleep, How We Move, How Long We Expect to Live: An Integrative Review of Lifestyle Behaviors and Subjective Life Expectancy.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Socioeconomic conditions and environmental exposures are well-established determinants of health and aging, yet the pathways through which they influence the aging process remain insufficiently understood. Clarifying these mechanisms is critical for developing effective, equity-focused public health interventions to support healthy aging; (2) Methods: We conducted a narrative review examining the relationships between socioeconomic conditions, environmental exposures, and aging-related health outcomes. While the scope was intentionally broad to capture diverse exposures and outcomes, we applied a systematic search strategy to identify relevant peer-reviewed studies; (3) Results: The search populated over 4000 articles; 33 relevant papers were selected. The evidence suggests that environmental exposures may mediate or modify the effects of socioeconomic disadvantage on aging. Conversely, socioeconomic conditions can alter the association between environmental factors and aging outcomes. Disadvantaged populations consistently face higher environmental burdens and exhibit poorer aging outcomes, including accelerated biological aging and increased risk of age-related disease; (4) Conclusions: The complex interplay between social and environmental factors contributes to disparities in aging. Our integrative approach highlights the need for more intersectional, longitudinal research to inform interventions that address the social and environmental determinants of healthy aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.