ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Uncommon and Accessory Electrocardiographic Findings in Brugada Syndrome: A Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a cardiac arrhythmic disorder associated with distinctive electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias. While the classic BrS ECG pattern is a coved ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads, a wide spectrum of atypical ECG presentations can mislead the diagnosis. This review discusses rare and under-recognized ECG findings associated with BrS, including its coexistence with right and left bundle branch block, alterations in peripheral leads and in the morphology of the QRS complex, as well as atrioventricular conduction abnormalities. Emphasis is placed on the clinical relevance of these findings, their underlying electrophysiological mechanisms, and their prognostic implications. Recognizing these atypical manifestations is critical to avoid misdiagnosing or failing to recognize the condition in patients with BrS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.